I split the link dissociation power by two as it produces 2 Chlorine atoms, and also I take it the an adverse of Chlorine's electron affinity to discover the sum required for -443 KJ/mol by fixing for x. Any type of clue what ns did wrong?
Posts: 1960Mole Snacks: +284/-12
CyrustorzRegular MemberPosts: 29Mole Snacks: +0/-2
Actually it turns out my worry was just: together I said in my initial post, I divided the link dissociation power by two even though the dissociation energy that they listed was already divided by two (the dissociation energy for 1/2 Cl2).I evaluate the aid but ns don't understand why anyone on this board needs to answer so cryptically. Us all have to take responsibility for our own discovering after class, for this reason obviously i realize that if I just take the answer you give me i won't discover anything and I will fail ~ above the test. You men don't need to be the persons trying to acquire me come think critically... Despite admittedly friend don't have to be doing any kind of of this at all. For this reason again, the help is appreciated.
You are watching: What is the magnitude of the lattice energy for cscl?
Ah! i didn't spot the either. But the suggest I was making is the the lattice energy is the power for the processCsCl(s)
Cs+(g) + Cl-(g)and is a confident quantity. What you were calculating, effectively or incorrectly, to be -U.
...I appreciate the help but i don't know why anyone on this board has to answer for this reason cryptically. Us all need to take responsibility for our own discovering after class, for this reason obviously i realize that if I just take the answer you offer me ns won't discover anything and also I will certainly fail ~ above the test. You men don't need to be the people trying to acquire me come think critically... Despite admittedly friend don't have to be doing any type of of this at all. For this reason again, the aid is appreciated.
See more: John Deere Gator Voltage Regulator Location ? Thread: Very Hot Voltage Regulator
I would imply that you carry out not digress v statements like this in a continual thread.We have a forum wherein you can comment on such things.SeeComments because that Staff and also Comments indigenous StafforGeneric DiscussionYou have actually done this sort of digression on various other posts and it leader to a disjointed thread.Some time shortly I will more than likely remove the distracting part of the write-up on this thread and possibly the others.